|
Post by Munnaf911 on Oct 22, 2023 2:06:38 GMT -5
It will be presumed, unless proven otherwise, that such dismissal does not occur when in the three years following the dismissal or cessation the worker returns to provide services to the same company or to another related company. The courts understand that the spirit of the exemption cannot be other than to create a tax benefit, for those workers who, starting from a definitive cessation of the company. Lose their employment relationship and with this suffer an evident economic damage.Since the computer was established as a work tool, the Supreme Court (with support from the Constitutional Court) has been moible number data drawing up a doctrine that tries to combine the right of the company to control its use and that of the privacy of the worker. The Supreme Court (judgment of March 8, 2011) establishes. That in the use by the worker of the computer media provided by the company, conflicts may arise that affect the privacy of workers, both in email (in which the implication it also extends to the secrecy of communications) such as browsing the Internet and accessing certain personal files on the computer. These conflicts arise due to the practical difficulties of establishing an absolute prohibition.
|
|